GOLD 2
88 RR
+26 RR
Current act
// PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Demo playerFictional dataNot live Riot data
Riven#EUW
Europe West
Updated 2 hours ago
View Full Analysis →Progression calendar →Career timeline →Weapon intelligence →Peak rank
GOLD 3
24 RR
Act rank
GOLD 2
88 RR
FragLogic Score
What is FragLogic Score?
FragLogic Score is a proprietary performance-analysis metric that summarizes multiple aspects of gameplay performance, including combat, round impact, consistency, survival and other supported indicators. It is not an MMR, ELO, matchmaking rating or replacement for VALORANT's official ranked system.
Current act
525
Recent form
Form is holding versus your season line
LLWWLWLWWW
Playstyle
Defensive Anchor
Consistent Performer
Primary insight
Lotus is currently your lowest-performing map
Based on 5 Lotus matches.
Current act
- Win Rate
- 54%
- K/D
- 0.71
- ACS
- 175
- ADR
- 121
- HS%
- 21%
- KAST
- 77%
Current rank
GOLD 2
88 RR
88% to GOLD 3
Peak
GOLD 3
+26 RR
Current act
// PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Current act
FragLogic Score
What is FragLogic Score?
FragLogic Score is a proprietary performance-analysis metric that summarizes multiple aspects of gameplay performance, including combat, round impact, consistency, survival and other supported indicators. It is not an MMR, ELO, matchmaking rating or replacement for VALORANT's official ranked system.
525/ 1000
Demo dataset percentile
Top 75% — Demo Dataset Percentile
Demo dataset percentile
Share of players in this fictional demo dataset with an equal or higher FragLogic Score. This is not an official VALORANT percentile and is not a ranked ladder.
Compared with players in this fictional demo dataset.
How is this calculated?
- Combat (28%) combines ACS, K/D, ADR and headshot rate.
- Impact (22%) weights round wins, opening-duel contribution, and support.
- Consistency (16%) looks at how tightly combat scores cluster match to match. It stays neutral until at least 5 matches.
- Survival (16%) uses KAST and first-death rate.
- Clutch (10%) uses tracked clutch attempts when there are enough of them; otherwise it leans on KAST.
- Recent form (8%) compares ACS in the last 10 matches to the rest of the window.
- Tiny samples cannot swing the score: one match is never treated as a finished rating.
- The result is scaled to 0–1000 for comparison inside this demo dataset. It is a performance score, not a rank.
Last 10
Recent form
Form is holding versus your season line
6W · 4L
+29 RR
Last 10 matches
- K/D
Recent
0.74
Season
0.71
- ACS
Recent
172
Season
175
- ADR
Recent
121
Season
121
+4.5%
-1.6%
-0.6%
Supported patterns
Why you're winning
What's going well
Killjoy is carrying more than your average
+13% WRYour Killjoy win rate is 13% above your account average across 12 matches.
+13% vs account average
Confidence MediumSample Based on 12 Killjoy matches.All matches
Supported patterns
Why you're losing
What needs work
Lotus is currently your lowest-performing map
40% WRWin rate drops to 40% on Lotus (5 matches).
-14% vs account average
Confidence LowSample Based on 5 Lotus matches.All matches
Performance recommendations
What to work on
Retrospective, data-backed suggestions from this sample. They do not guarantee improvement or a rank change.
01
Raise combat output
Combat is your weakest pillar at 25/100.
Recommendation
Consider reviewing low-percentage duels from this sample before changing aim routine.
25/100
02
Improve Lotus performance
Win rate drops to 40% on Lotus (5 matches).
Recommendation
Consider reviewing your first five rounds on that map in this sample and noting where first deaths clustered.
40% WR
// RANK GOAL
Next rank
GOLD 3
From GOLD 2 · 88 RR
RR remaining
12
100 RR cap for Gold in this app. Not an invented ladder rule.
// NEXT SESSION OBJECTIVE
Reduce first deaths from 11% → below 10%.
Current 11% · target below 10%
Full progression calendarCareer timelineWeapon intelligence
Breakdown
Select a category to see what contributes to it.
Combat
Impact
Impact
A custom category that blends round conversion with opening-duel contribution — not a raw Riot stat.
Consistency
Survival
Clutch
// PLAYER DNA
All matches
Riven#EUW
GOLD 2
FragLogic Score
What is FragLogic Score?
FragLogic Score is a proprietary performance-analysis metric that summarizes multiple aspects of gameplay performance, including combat, round impact, consistency, survival and other supported indicators. It is not an MMR, ELO, matchmaking rating or replacement for VALORANT's official ranked system.
525/1000
Primary playstyle
Player DNA
A rule-based identity card from your match sample: playstyle, attribute scores, records and streaks. It is not a model prediction.
Defensive Anchor
Secondary
Consistent Performer
79% confidence · 26 matches
Key strengths
- Clutch
- Late-round consistency
- Support impact
Key weaknesses
- Combat output
- Opening duels
- Defensive survival
- Combat25
- Impact49
- Opening Duels17
- Consistency76
- Survival72
- Clutch88
- Team Impact67
// SESSION ANALYSIS
Session review
Last 5 matches
5 matches
2W · 3L
Declining
-24 RR
This session
Performance Score
Performance Score
The same FragLogic scoring model applied to the matches in this session.
482
-22.1% vs previous session
- K/D
- 0.65
- ACS
- 162
- ADR
- 114
- HS%
- 19%
- KAST
- 75%
Session vs previous session
Current session
5 matches · 2W / 3L
-24 RR
Previous session
5 matches · 4W / 1L
+53 RR
- K/D
- 0.65 vs 0.85
- ACS
- 162 vs 182
- ADR
- 114 vs 128
- Win Rate
- 40% vs 80%
-23.6% ↓
-11.0% ↓
-10.9% ↓
-40 pts ↓
Best game
Victory
10–10
Split · Killjoy
173 ACS · 0.57 K/D
Worst game
Defeat
11–9
Lotus · Chamber
150 ACS · 0.56 K/D
What changed?
Damage per round declined
You dealt 11% less damage per round than in your previous session.
Low confidence · Based on 5 matches.
Opening duels increased
Opening-kill rate moved from 6% to 7% of rounds compared with the previous session.
Low confidence · Based on 5 rounds.
Matches in this session
Rank progression
RR over time
ShowHide
RR over time
ShowHide// RANK PROGRESSION
Milestones
GOLD 2
76 RR · Aug 21, 2026
GOLD 3
10 RR · Aug 29, 2026
Rank progression
- Rank changes
- 8
- Wins
- 14
- Losses
- 12
+26 RR
Selected period
Performance trends
Score over the season
ShowHide
Score over the season
ShowHidePerformance trend
Score moved from 558 to 525 across 22 matches.
Match history
Recent games
ShowHide
Recent games
ShowHideResult
Date
Defeat
4 hours ago
10 — 13
Split
Cypher
- ACS
- 170
- K/D
- 0.57
- RR
- -18 RR
12/21/6 · HS 25% · 28:43
Defeat
4 hours ago
11 — 9
Lotus
Chamber
- ACS
- 150
- K/D
- 0.56
- RR
- -18 RR
15/27/5 · HS 18% · 29:23
Victory
5 hours ago
10 — 10
Split
Killjoy
- ACS
- 173
- K/D
- 0.57
- RR
- +17 RR
13/23/7 · HS 17% · 22:48
Victory
2 days ago
9 — 11
Bind
Cypher
- ACS
- 155
- K/D
- 0.71
- RR
- +13 RR
17/24/7 · HS 18% · 31:00
Defeat
2 days ago
11 — 13
Split
Killjoy
- ACS
- 163
- K/D
- 0.89
- RR
- -18 RR
16/18/6 · HS 18% · 28:50
Victory
2 days ago
11 — 9
Bind
Sage
- ACS
- 185
- K/D
- 0.81
- RR
- +17 RR
17/21/5 · HS 18% · 24:24
Defeat
4 days ago
5 — 13
Ascent
Chamber
- ACS
- 175
- K/D
- 0.79
- RR
- -17 RR
15/19/6 · HS 22% · 23:12
Victory
4 days ago
13 — 8
Split
Killjoy
- ACS
- 171
- K/D
- 0.74
- RR
- +17 RR
17/23/8 · HS 24% · 21:25
Victory
4 days ago
12 — 12
Ascent
Killjoy
- ACS
- 167
- K/D
- 0.88
- RR
- +17 RR
15/17/6 · HS 23% · 22:27
Victory
4 days ago
13 — 7
Icebox
Killjoy
- ACS
- 217
- K/D
- 1.06
- RR
- +19 RR
18/17/6 · HS 18% · 26:47
Agents
Agent analytics
ShowHide
Agent analytics
ShowHide// AGENT INTELLIGENCE
All matches
Your Agents
Best supported agent
Killjoy
67% WR
12 matches · 0.71 K/D · 172 ACS
Confidence MediumSample 12 matches
Sample-weighted win rate, K/D, ACS and ADR among agents with at least 5 matches.
Best win rate
Killjoy
67% WR
12 matches · 0.71 K/D · 172 ACS
Confidence MediumSample 12 matches
Highest WR among agents with at least 5 matches. One-match 100% is not treated as best.
Best combat performance
Cypher
33% WR
6 matches · 0.74 K/D · 178 ACS
Confidence LowSample 6 matches
K/D, ACS, ADR, and sample size. Not win rate.
Most played
Killjoy
67% WR
12 matches · 0.71 K/D · 172 ACS
Confidence MediumSample 12 matches
Highest match count in this sample.
Most consistent
Killjoy
67% WR
12 matches · 0.71 K/D · 172 ACS
Confidence MediumSample 12 matches
Lowest ACS swing among agents with at least 5 matches.
Most improved
Killjoy
67% WR
12 matches · 0.71 K/D · 172 ACS
Confidence MediumSample 12 matches
Needs 8 matches and a real second-half lift in ACS or win rate.
Killjoy
Sentinel
- Matches
- 12
- Win Rate
- 67%
- K/D
- 0.71
- ACS
- 172
- ADR
- 119
- KAST
- 77%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 6%
Cypher
Sentinel
- Matches
- 6
- Win Rate
- 33%
- K/D
- 0.74
- ACS
- 178
- ADR
- 122
- KAST
- 78%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 6%
Chamber
Sentinel
- Matches
- 4
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.62
- ACS
- 172
- ADR
- 121
- KAST
- 75%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 6%
Insufficient sample
Sage
Sentinel
- Matches
- 3
- Win Rate
- 100%
- K/D
- 0.75
- ACS
- 180
- ADR
- 125
- KAST
- 80%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 8%
Insufficient sample
Neon
Duelist
- Matches
- 1
- Win Rate
- 100%
- K/D
- 0.75
- ACS
- 186
- ADR
- 136
- KAST
- 83%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 10%
Insufficient sample
// AGENT PLAYSTYLE
Agent playstyle
A rule-based duty label for a most-used agent: Entry, Fragger, Support, Controller, Anchor, or Flex.
Most-used agent duties
Published only when opening duels, combat, support, role, and side conversion support a clear duty.
Killjoy
Sentinel
Duty
Anchor
Medium confidence
Based on 12 matches.
- Opening duels
- 6% of rounds
- K/D
- 0.71
- Attack / Defense WR
- 50% / 53%
Maps
Map analytics
ShowHide
Map analytics
ShowHide// MAP INTELLIGENCE
All matches
Map performance
Highest Win Rate
Ascent
60% WR
5 matches
Confidence LowSample 5 matches
0.80 K/D · 174 ACS
Highest WR among maps with at least 5 matches. Ties break on K/D, then ACS.
Best Supported Performance
Best supported performance
A sample-weighted blend of win rate, K/D, ACS and ADR. It is not “best map” and it is not raw win rate.
Ascent
60% WR
5 matches
Confidence LowSample 5 matches
0.80 K/D · 174 ACS
Win rate, K/D, ACS and ADR, weighted by sample size — not win rate alone.
Most Played
Split
50% WR
6 matches
Confidence LowSample 6 matches
Highest match count in this sample.
Lowest Performance
Lotus
40% WR
5 matches
Confidence LowSample 5 matches
0.47 K/D · 152 ACS
Lowest win rate among maps with at least 5 matches, excluding the supported-performance map.
Split
6 matches
- Wins
- 3
- Losses
- 3
- Win Rate
- 50%
- K/D
- 0.69
- ACS
- 171
- ADR
- 117
- KAST
- 79%
- Attack WR
- 48%
- Defense WR
- 56%
Ascent
5 matches
- Wins
- 3
- Losses
- 2
- Win Rate
- 60%
- K/D
- 0.80
- ACS
- 174
- ADR
- 121
- KAST
- 75%
- Attack WR
- 49%
- Defense WR
- 46%
Lotus
5 matches
- Wins
- 2
- Losses
- 3
- Win Rate
- 40%
- K/D
- 0.47
- ACS
- 152
- ADR
- 106
- KAST
- 79%
- Attack WR
- 54%
- Defense WR
- 54%
Abyss
4 matches
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 3
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 75%
- K/D
- 0.94
- ACS
- 195
- ADR
- 138
- KAST
- 77%
- Attack WR
- 53%
- Defense WR
- 44%
Bind
3 matches
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 2
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 67%
- K/D
- 0.75
- ACS
- 166
- ADR
- 119
- KAST
- 78%
- Attack WR
- 54%
- Defense WR
- 53%
Icebox
2 matches
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 1
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 50%
- K/D
- 1.00
- ACS
- 216
- ADR
- 148
- KAST
- 78%
- Attack WR
- 59%
- Defense WR
- 50%
Breeze
1 match
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 0
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.46
- ACS
- 186
- ADR
- 122
- KAST
- 70%
- Attack WR
- 42%
- Defense WR
- 33%
// SUPPORTED MAP + AGENT COMBINATIONS
Map + agent ranking
Combinations are ranked by sample size, win rate, K/D and ACS together.
Ranked combinations
Ranked by sample size, win rate, K/D and ACS. A one-match 100% WR pair cannot take first place.
Killjoy + Split
3 matches
67% WR
0.72 K/D · 169 ACS
Insufficient sample
Killjoy + Ascent
2 matches
100% WR
0.80 K/D · 167 ACS
Insufficient sample
Killjoy + Abyss
2 matches
100% WR
1.06 K/D · 189 ACS
Insufficient sample
Killjoy + Lotus
2 matches
50% WR
0.40 K/D · 149 ACS
Insufficient sample
Cypher + Ascent
2 matches
50% WR
0.79 K/D · 181 ACS
Insufficient sample
Cypher + Split
2 matches
0% WR
0.60 K/D · 168 ACS
Insufficient sample
// MAP SIDE ANALYSIS
Attack vs defense by map
Split
6 matches
Attack
48%
0.50 K/D
Defense
56%
0.90 K/D
Map diagnosis
Gunfight output is stronger on defense even though round conversion is closer.
Lotus
5 matches
Attack
54%
0.34 K/D
Defense
54%
0.62 K/D
Map diagnosis
Gunfight output is stronger on defense even though round conversion is closer.
Ascent
5 matches
Attack
49%
0.58 K/D
Defense
46%
1.02 K/D
Map diagnosis
Gunfight output is stronger on defense even though round conversion is closer.
Abyss
4 matches
Attack
53%
0.71 K/D
Defense
44%
1.17 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Bind
3 matches
Attack
54%
0.65 K/D
Defense
53%
0.82 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Icebox
2 matches
Attack
59%
0.87 K/D
Defense
50%
1.10 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Breeze
1 matches
Attack
42%
0.29 K/D
Defense
33%
0.70 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Sides
Attack vs defense
ShowHide
Attack vs defense
ShowHideCurrent act
Attack vs Defense
Attack and defense are close enough that neither side is a clear edge.
- Opening kills
- 34
- Opening deaths
- 62
- Opening differential
- -28
Attack
51%
- K/D
- 0.53
- ACS
- 175
- Opening kills
- 8
Defense
50%
- K/D
- 0.88
- ACS
- 175
- Opening kills
- 26