IRON 2
33 RR
-169 RR
Current act
// PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Demo playerFictional dataNot live Riot data
Zero#EUW
Europe West
Updated 2 hours ago
View Full Analysis →Progression calendar →Career timeline →Weapon intelligence →Peak rank
IRON 3
41 RR
Act rank
IRON 2
33 RR
FragLogic Score
What is FragLogic Score?
FragLogic Score is a proprietary performance-analysis metric that summarizes multiple aspects of gameplay performance, including combat, round impact, consistency, survival and other supported indicators. It is not an MMR, ELO, matchmaking rating or replacement for VALORANT's official ranked system.
Current act
330
Recent form
Form is holding versus your season line
LLWLWLWLLW
Playstyle
Flexible Player
Supportive Controller
Primary insight
Phoenix is carrying more than your average
Based on 9 Phoenix matches.
Current act
- Win Rate
- 33%
- K/D
- 0.36
- ACS
- 133
- ADR
- 97
- HS%
- 13%
- KAST
- 61%
Current rank
IRON 2
33 RR
33% to IRON 3
Peak
IRON 3
-169 RR
Current act
// PLAYER PERFORMANCE
Current act
FragLogic Score
What is FragLogic Score?
FragLogic Score is a proprietary performance-analysis metric that summarizes multiple aspects of gameplay performance, including combat, round impact, consistency, survival and other supported indicators. It is not an MMR, ELO, matchmaking rating or replacement for VALORANT's official ranked system.
330/ 1000
Demo dataset percentile
Top 100% — Demo Dataset Percentile
Demo dataset percentile
Share of players in this fictional demo dataset with an equal or higher FragLogic Score. This is not an official VALORANT percentile and is not a ranked ladder.
Compared with players in this fictional demo dataset.
How is this calculated?
- Combat (28%) combines ACS, K/D, ADR and headshot rate.
- Impact (22%) weights round wins, opening-duel contribution, and support.
- Consistency (16%) looks at how tightly combat scores cluster match to match. It stays neutral until at least 5 matches.
- Survival (16%) uses KAST and first-death rate.
- Clutch (10%) uses tracked clutch attempts when there are enough of them; otherwise it leans on KAST.
- Recent form (8%) compares ACS in the last 10 matches to the rest of the window.
- Tiny samples cannot swing the score: one match is never treated as a finished rating.
- The result is scaled to 0–1000 for comparison inside this demo dataset. It is a performance score, not a rank.
Last 10
Recent form
Form is holding versus your season line
4W · 6L
-67 RR
Last 10 matches
- K/D
Recent
0.36
Season
0.36
- ACS
Recent
134
Season
133
- ADR
Recent
97
Season
97
-1.6%
+0.2%
+0.3%
Supported patterns
Why you're winning
What's going well
Phoenix is carrying more than your average
+11% WRYour Phoenix win rate is 11% above your account average across 9 matches.
+11% vs account average
Confidence LowSample Based on 9 Phoenix matches.All matches
Your performance has improved over your last 10 matches
+15% WRWin rate moved from 25% to 40% while ACS rose to 134.
+15% WR vs previous 8 matches
Confidence LowSample Based on 10 matches.Last 10 matches
Supported patterns
Why you're losing
What needs work
Not enough data yet.
Negative patterns are only shown when the sample can support them.
Performance recommendations
What to work on
Retrospective, data-backed suggestions from this sample. They do not guarantee improvement or a rank change.
01
Raise combat output
Combat is your weakest pillar at 1/100.
Recommendation
Consider reviewing low-percentage duels from this sample before changing aim routine.
1/100
// RANK GOAL
Next rank
IRON 3
From IRON 2 · 33 RR
RR remaining
67
100 RR cap for Iron in this app. Not an invented ladder rule.
// NEXT SESSION OBJECTIVE
Reduce first deaths from 24% → below 15%.
Current 24% · target below 15%
Full progression calendarCareer timelineWeapon intelligence
Breakdown
Select a category to see what contributes to it.
Combat
Impact
Impact
A custom category that blends round conversion with opening-duel contribution — not a raw Riot stat.
Consistency
Survival
Clutch
// PLAYER DNA
All matches
Zero#EUW
IRON 2
FragLogic Score
What is FragLogic Score?
FragLogic Score is a proprietary performance-analysis metric that summarizes multiple aspects of gameplay performance, including combat, round impact, consistency, survival and other supported indicators. It is not an MMR, ELO, matchmaking rating or replacement for VALORANT's official ranked system.
330/1000
Primary playstyle
Player DNA
A rule-based identity card from your match sample: playstyle, attribute scores, records and streaks. It is not a model prediction.
Flexible Player
Secondary
Supportive Controller
79% confidence · 18 matches
Key strengths
- Support impact
- Clutch
- Late-round consistency
Key weaknesses
- Combat output
- First-death rate
- Opening duels
- Combat1
- Impact31
- Opening Duels15
- Consistency80
- Survival19
- Clutch94
- Team Impact69
// SESSION ANALYSIS
Session review
Last 5 matches
5 matches
2W · 3L
Declining
-32 RR
This session
Performance Score
Performance Score
The same FragLogic scoring model applied to the matches in this session.
333
-15.7% vs previous session
- K/D
- 0.33
- ACS
- 137
- ADR
- 101
- HS%
- 14%
- KAST
- 58%
Session vs previous session
Current session
5 matches · 2W / 3L
-32 RR
Previous session
5 matches · 2W / 3L
-35 RR
- K/D
- 0.33 vs 0.39
- ACS
- 137 vs 130
- ADR
- 101 vs 93
- Win Rate
- 40% vs 40%
-14.3% ↓
+6.0% ↑
+8.7% ↑
0 pts
Best game
Victory
12–9
Sunset · Killjoy
149 ACS · 0.30 K/D
Worst game
Defeat
5–13
Split · Phoenix
132 ACS · 0.29 K/D
What changed?
Damage per round increased
You dealt 9% more damage per round than in your previous session.
Low confidence · Based on 5 matches.
Defensive rounds cooled off
Your defensive round win rate moved from 60% to 45% versus the previous session.
Low confidence · Based on 5 matches.
Opening duels decreased
Opening-kill rate moved from 6% to 5% of rounds compared with the previous session.
Low confidence · Based on 5 rounds.
Matches in this session
Rank progression
RR over time
ShowHide
RR over time
ShowHide// RANK PROGRESSION
Milestones
BRONZE 1
13 RR · Aug 26, 2026
IRON 3
94 RR · Aug 26, 2026
IRON 2 CURRENT
100 RR · Aug 30, 2026
Rank progression
- Rank changes
- 6
- Wins
- 6
- Losses
- 12
-169 RR
Selected period
Performance trends
Score over the season
ShowHide
Score over the season
ShowHidePerformance trend
Score moved from 412 to 330 across 14 matches.
Match history
Recent games
ShowHide
Recent games
ShowHideResult
Date
Defeat
7 hours ago
4 — 13
Split
Phoenix
- ACS
- 141
- K/D
- 0.36
- RR
- -20 RR
10/28/9 · HS 11% · 28:07
Defeat
8 hours ago
5 — 13
Split
Phoenix
- ACS
- 132
- K/D
- 0.29
- RR
- -20 RR
8/28/9 · HS 16% · 26:46
Victory
9 hours ago
12 — 9
Sunset
Killjoy
- ACS
- 149
- K/D
- 0.30
- RR
- +13 RR
8/27/10 · HS 13% · 29:50
Defeat
2 days ago
12 — 12
Split
Killjoy
- ACS
- 153
- K/D
- 0.39
- RR
- -18 RR
11/28/9 · HS 15% · 28:30
Victory
2 days ago
10 — 11
Abyss
Phoenix
- ACS
- 110
- K/D
- 0.32
- RR
- +13 RR
9/28/8 · HS 16% · 27:11
Defeat
2 days ago
11 — 9
Bind
Chamber
- ACS
- 137
- K/D
- 0.43
- RR
- -19 RR
12/28/9 · HS 13% · 30:55
Victory
5 days ago
13 — 6
Sunset
Killjoy
- ACS
- 142
- K/D
- 0.41
- RR
- +13 RR
11/27/4 · HS 14% · 21:58
Defeat
5 days ago
7 — 13
Split
Phoenix
- ACS
- 119
- K/D
- 0.29
- RR
- -22 RR
8/28/6 · HS 15% · 28:37
Defeat
5 days ago
9 — 11
Breeze
Killjoy
- ACS
- 121
- K/D
- 0.21
- RR
- -19 RR
6/28/8 · HS 12% · 26:35
Victory
5 days ago
13 — 4
Haven
Phoenix
- ACS
- 129
- K/D
- 0.67
- RR
- +12 RR
14/21/8 · HS 11% · 33:00
Agents
Agent analytics
ShowHide
Agent analytics
ShowHide// AGENT INTELLIGENCE
All matches
Your Agents
Best supported agent
Phoenix
44% WR
9 matches · 0.37 K/D · 130 ACS
Confidence LowSample 9 matches
Sample-weighted win rate, K/D, ACS and ADR among agents with at least 5 matches.
Best win rate
Phoenix
44% WR
9 matches · 0.37 K/D · 130 ACS
Confidence LowSample 9 matches
Highest WR among agents with at least 5 matches. One-match 100% is not treated as best.
Best combat performance
Phoenix
44% WR
9 matches · 0.37 K/D · 130 ACS
Confidence LowSample 9 matches
K/D, ACS, ADR, and sample size. Not win rate.
Most played
Phoenix
44% WR
9 matches · 0.37 K/D · 130 ACS
Confidence LowSample 9 matches
Highest match count in this sample.
Most consistent
Killjoy
33% WR
6 matches · 0.33 K/D · 139 ACS
Confidence LowSample 6 matches
Lowest ACS swing among agents with at least 5 matches.
Most improved
Not enough data yet.
Needs 8 matches and a real second-half lift in ACS or win rate.
Phoenix
Duelist
- Matches
- 9
- Win Rate
- 44%
- K/D
- 0.37
- ACS
- 130
- ADR
- 96
- KAST
- 61%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 5%
Killjoy
Sentinel
- Matches
- 6
- Win Rate
- 33%
- K/D
- 0.33
- ACS
- 139
- ADR
- 101
- KAST
- 61%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 6%
Sage
Sentinel
- Matches
- 2
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.40
- ACS
- 128
- ADR
- 94
- KAST
- 61%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 10%
Insufficient sample
Chamber
Sentinel
- Matches
- 1
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.43
- ACS
- 137
- ADR
- 91
- KAST
- 60%
- Opening Duel Rate
- 5%
Insufficient sample
// AGENT PLAYSTYLE
Agent playstyle
A rule-based duty label for a most-used agent: Entry, Fragger, Support, Controller, Anchor, or Flex.
Most-used agent duties
Published only when opening duels, combat, support, role, and side conversion support a clear duty.
Phoenix
Duelist
Duty
Support
Low confidence
Based on 9 matches.
- Opening duels
- 5% of rounds
- K/D
- 0.37
- Attack / Defense WR
- 55% / 46%
Killjoy
Sentinel
Duty
Anchor
Low confidence
Based on 6 matches.
- Opening duels
- 6% of rounds
- K/D
- 0.33
- Attack / Defense WR
- 49% / 53%
Maps
Map analytics
ShowHide
Map analytics
ShowHide// MAP INTELLIGENCE
All matches
Map performance
Highest Win Rate
Split
20% WR
5 matches
Confidence LowSample 5 matches
0.33 K/D · 137 ACS
Highest WR among maps with at least 5 matches. Ties break on K/D, then ACS.
Best Supported Performance
Best supported performance
A sample-weighted blend of win rate, K/D, ACS and ADR. It is not “best map” and it is not raw win rate.
Split
20% WR
5 matches
Confidence LowSample 5 matches
0.33 K/D · 137 ACS
Win rate, K/D, ACS and ADR, weighted by sample size — not win rate alone.
Most Played
Split
20% WR
5 matches
Confidence LowSample 5 matches
Highest match count in this sample.
Lowest Performance
Not enough data yet. Need at least 5 matches.
Lowest win rate among maps with at least 5 matches, excluding the supported-performance map.
Split
5 matches
- Wins
- 1
- Losses
- 4
- Win Rate
- 20%
- K/D
- 0.33
- ACS
- 137
- ADR
- 99
- KAST
- 59%
- Attack WR
- 47%
- Defense WR
- 39%
Sunset
4 matches
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 2
- Losses
- 2
- Win Rate
- 50%
- K/D
- 0.35
- ACS
- 142
- ADR
- 101
- KAST
- 63%
- Attack WR
- 53%
- Defense WR
- 51%
Haven
3 matches
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 2
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 67%
- K/D
- 0.56
- ACS
- 132
- ADR
- 95
- KAST
- 66%
- Attack WR
- 69%
- Defense WR
- 75%
Abyss
3 matches
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 1
- Losses
- 2
- Win Rate
- 33%
- K/D
- 0.31
- ACS
- 116
- ADR
- 90
- KAST
- 57%
- Attack WR
- 48%
- Defense WR
- 39%
Bind
1 match
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 0
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.43
- ACS
- 137
- ADR
- 91
- KAST
- 60%
- Attack WR
- 50%
- Defense WR
- 63%
Lotus
1 match
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 0
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.32
- ACS
- 148
- ADR
- 108
- KAST
- 69%
- Attack WR
- 67%
- Defense WR
- 42%
Breeze
1 match
Insufficient sample
- Wins
- 0
- Losses
- 1
- Win Rate
- 0%
- K/D
- 0.21
- ACS
- 121
- ADR
- 92
- KAST
- 54%
- Attack WR
- 38%
- Defense WR
- 58%
// SUPPORTED MAP + AGENT COMBINATIONS
Map + agent ranking
Combinations are ranked by sample size, win rate, K/D and ACS together.
Ranked combinations
Ranked by sample size, win rate, K/D and ACS. A one-match 100% WR pair cannot take first place.
Phoenix + Split
4 matches
25% WR
0.31 K/D · 132 ACS
Insufficient sample
Killjoy + Sunset
3 matches
67% WR
0.35 K/D · 145 ACS
Insufficient sample
Phoenix + Haven
2 matches
100% WR
0.63 K/D · 137 ACS
Insufficient sample
Phoenix + Abyss
2 matches
50% WR
0.30 K/D · 113 ACS
Insufficient sample
Killjoy + Split
1 match
0% WR
0.39 K/D · 153 ACS
Insufficient sample
Chamber + Bind
1 match
0% WR
0.43 K/D · 137 ACS
Insufficient sample
// MAP SIDE ANALYSIS
Attack vs defense by map
Split
5 matches
Attack
47%
0.27 K/D
Defense
39%
0.42 K/D
Map diagnosis
No meaningful side gap in this sample.
Sunset
4 matches
Attack
53%
0.33 K/D
Defense
51%
0.38 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Abyss
3 matches
Attack
48%
0.31 K/D
Defense
39%
0.31 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Haven
3 matches
Attack
69%
0.45 K/D
Defense
75%
0.69 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Bind
1 matches
Attack
50%
0.29 K/D
Defense
63%
0.64 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Breeze
1 matches
Attack
38%
0.27 K/D
Defense
58%
0.18 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Lotus
1 matches
Attack
67%
0.33 K/D
Defense
42%
0.31 K/D
Map diagnosis
Insufficient sample
Sides
Attack vs defense
ShowHide
Attack vs defense
ShowHideCurrent act
Attack vs Defense
Attack and defense are close enough that neither side is a clear edge.
- Opening kills
- 21
- Opening deaths
- 87
- Opening differential
- -66
Attack
53%
- K/D
- 0.32
- ACS
- 134
- Opening kills
- 3
Defense
50%
- K/D
- 0.41
- ACS
- 133
- Opening kills
- 18